An open letter to Moon Lee --- from her ex-husband

My family and I had engaged a publicist, Ms. Nat Daniel, to “engage” your on-going attempts to fuel your fan base in recent years.  I have just informed Nat that you have not posted a new blog essay in 38 days, the longest interval that I have noted.  If this represents your sincere attempt to stop the foolishness of still flaunting your “celebrity” status, then I would stop Nat’s campaign to propagate the real truth behind your actions of years past.

I now have the perfect new life after the divorce.  As I said before, my family and I are NOT focused on your past conduct or misconduct; there is nothing now for me to forgive or to forget.  You and I both know where the truth lies.  What we cannot tolerate is your continued actions to push your popularity within your fan base through your sina.com blog.  Fans by nature are silly and ignorant anyway because they have no first hand knowledge of their idol.  They live vicariously on what they believe your real personage could be.  So we do not care that your fans like you and follow you avidly.  What is annoying is that your attempts to maintain your “image” constantly feeds an interest in your “personality” and thereby fuels more attention on your notorious sex scandal.  As long as the website pundits keep writing about your ratings as a movie star embroiled in a famous sex scandal, then my name is dragged into it as well. 

If you were tired of being scandalized, then it would help if you stop flaunting yourself in any capacity.  If you would like to continue to “fan” your fan base, then we would help you become more famous than you would ever want --- there is still a lot of truth about you that can be told.  

With your past actions, it is wiser to be invisible.  Hopefully, people can forget your once upon notoriety and therefore not list your misconduct over and over again in the media.  Choose wisely and we can both have this behind us!  

Dennis Law MD

Moon Lee is as guilty as sin by Natalia Khan Daniel

As a woman and usually sympathetic about women’s causes, I must confess that I agree with the Dr. Dennis Law family’s attitude to press the issues of Moon Lee’s guilt and personal failings unless she accepts responsibility for her actions or until she relents on furthering her popularity or flaunting her false innocence on her Chinese blog.

We knew that, at the time of the infamous “Closet Affair” scandal, the Chinese media was robust in covering all the news and gossip because Moon Lee was indeed a media darling of the past.  Despite overwhelming publicity about this incredible story of lust and betrayal, the English-speaking world on the US side where Moon lived at that time was conspicuously kept in the dark.  When I did some research, it became clear that Dr. Law would be in more legal jeopardy with his divorce proceedings if he had made public statements about the facts of the sexual scandal.  Colorado divorce laws, as in many other states in the US, are “no-fault” by statute.  Therefore, any attempt by any side to make statements about sexual indiscretion of the other party would not only be irrelevant by law but may infuriate the judge for inflaming the opposing party without receiving any legal advantage.  That would explain the need for total silence in the English-speaking world in North America.

At this later date, I agree that it is meaningful to set the record straight in the English-speaking world regardless of the magnitude of interest, large or small.  Moon Lee had for the longest time continued a subtle campaign to flaunt her “good side” on the Chinese web.  That is her right!  But it is also our right to make the truth behind one of the most spectacular sex scandals of Chinese modern history become an indelible record in cyberspace for the purpose of historical archiving.  It is grossly unfair for Moon Lee to plead her innocence without any contestation.

All over the Chinese web, there are still weekly new essays by website pundits that repeatedly portray this celebrity scandal of historic proportions.  Some simply write about the truth.  Some accuse Dr. Law of blaming Moon’s absurd extra-marital affair on her strong sex drive – an accusation that was fictitious and invented by a Hong Kong magazine because de facto, Dr. Law would never have been stupid enough to make any self-deprecating statement about her sexual drive or inclination.  Some writers would write about the nasty divorce where both sides accuse each other of affairs but no one could ever know the truth.  Even though the last assertion itself is factually true, we all know that the real truth exists.  Dr. Law knows it; his wife knows it; his daughter knows it; all members of his company know it; and I know it too well too after all the interviews and research.      

I am a woman, and I cannot accept her piety.  Moon Lee’s sexual affair with her “adoptive” son was obscene and stupid.  Her seduction of a minor (also an employee) was probably illegal even in China.  Her denial of the truth was incredible.  Her attempts to rob her husband and the Law family during the divorce were devious and immoral.  Her flaunting of her clean life and her wholesomeness after the divorce is disingenuous and deceitful.  Her active blog writings fuel a celebrity status that just invites more nuisance and proliferation of lies.

  

So if Moon Lee continues to indulge in her “goodness” on her blog in order to keep her “celebrity” alive, it is necessary for us to sustain a campaign of the truth in the more sane English-speaking world.  The fact of the matter is that I will be ordered to stop this campaign only if Moon Lee either admits her misconduct or stops publicizing her image.  It is just that simple!  

Natalia Khan Daniel

The Moon Lee Affair --- ONLY THE WAY to a hellish life by Natalia Khan Daniel

In my Hong Kong trip recently, I viewed the DVD of the movie, Only the Way, a “real piece of work” that Moon Lee produced and acted in while she was in the height of her divorce in 2008.  That was another unexpected shocker!  

I was told Moon was responsible for re-writing the script for first time director and close personal friend, Dung Tak Wing.  After watching this totally embarrassing movie, it is easy to understand why it received recognition as the number one “Shit Film” in Hong Kong that year.

It is bewildering enough for anyone to believe that a satirically funny movie about the Buddhist faith can ever be made for Chinese moviegoers.  It is even more unfathomable why Moon Lee would choose to write into the dumb movie script a replay of her real life scandalous affair with an unworthy teenager.  Worse still, the then confused Moon, together with the idiotic first time director Dung, decided to use the real life transgressor to act the role of the errant kid in the film --- including actually seducing the twenty-one years older Moon Lee in bed and soon after being caught red-handed by the husband.  Those decisions in 2008 transcend any logic and reasoning, and for most thinking people, actions like those would raise questions about the mental health of the participants.  Did Moon make that choice as producer because she thought making fun of the real-life facts would discredit the truth?  In retrospect, including reading some articles by reporters, most sensible people believed that facts of the reported scandal were true.  Only prejudiced relatives, close friends and fiendish fans of Moon Lee believed otherwise --- and that number was tiny in comparison to the population at large.  Moon Lee and director Dung made something already bad into something intolerably horrible.  They truly became the epitome of the Hollywood movie, Dumb and Dumber!

Examine the movie photo (included here) that Hong Kong reporters got their hands on and published during the release of the movie in 2008.  I believed they used it with sarcastic intent.  Pictured here is the real-life scandalous teenage lover-boy, lying side by side in bed with Moon Lee, as a still photo of one of the scenes in the movie.  They look as “real life” as can be, because neither of the lovers had much theatrical makeup.  They did not even want to be transformed into another fictional character that is not their true nature.  One can absolutely believe that teenage lover Zong was as ugly as he looked in the picture, playing himself.  And the famous Moon Lee, without significant makeup help at nearly age forty, did not look any better either!  As in real life, she looked like she was an older hooker, except her services were free and she made incalculable sacrifices.  Unbelievable!!!

In the order of director Dung, lover kid Zong, and actress Moon Lee, the infamous threesome is now the “dumb, dumber, and dumbest”! 

The more I find out, the more I am certain that this sex scandal is the “mother” of them all!